Religion has the power to manipulate humans to believe unrealistic doctrine and engage in destructive behavior. Religious are groups of people involved with unorthodox practices that are disguised as Christianity.
Like the Soriano group, cult members belong to an elite structure group dictated by leaders presiding ministers who profess to be the only ones communicating through God. By keeping the lives of their members compartmentalized, cult leaders allow no time for their followers to reflect Religion dating daan think, leading to stress and mental illness.
Through using lies and twisted scriptural language, Soriano is misleading multitudes of people into hell. Sadly, you his followers remain blind as Soriano excites you with Scriptures mixed with falsehoods. How sad you followers are taught to be hateful to fellow humans, breeding a culture of hate, even abusing others and attacking personalities in different positions?
The point is made not just to hate the badness, but to actually hate the person, which is not the so-called Christian love add followers claim to show. ADD policies and prohibitions reach into virtually every area of life and cover minutia to the extreme.
Pleasures are condemned including drinking, marrying, as well holidays like Christmas. Higher education, career advancement are "Religion dating daan" prohibited because Soriano teaches that the Bible is the best University ever-and there is no need to purse higher education-a straw man argument.
The partnership between Ora and Perez did not last. When Perez died, Soriano renamed the organisation so many times to prevent further court cases with his former colleagues and church leaders. Before, single members were not allowed get married at all, Soriano would not allow it. We did not have a Holy Supper etc. Emphasis on the leaders instead of God is an outstanding cult tactic. As you can see in the right photo, unusually for a Christian religion, they have chosen this representation, which does not include Jesus at all, but has Soriano alone.
He and Daniel Razon have seized control for themselves, and consolidated that control. Soriano and the MCGI have managed to deflect attention from Jesus by means of their doctrine that only through Soriano can one know God, and that salvation can only be achieved through association with the cult. One would expect that the definition for one of Members of Church of God International Religion dating daan be a person that worships God.
And they are willingly allowing Soriano to fill their heads with falsehoods. Keeping them from finding the true person of Jesus Christ in the Bible.
Keeping themselves from being set free. In a desperate move against our blogsite, homosexual rapist and cult leader Soriano, through his lawyers, filed a complaint to WordPress about some of the material published on our site. This site is too much for Soriano and his followers. BTW, here we have a lunatic whose sites are full of material copied from other sites and no one has sued him for that.
Why would any one waste time suing a worthless false preacher like Soriano over material such as images? Of course Soriano would do that. Because he is bitter the world is knowing who he really is through the exposure of blunt sites such as The Real Truth behind the Ang Dating Cult.
Of course they will go miles and lodge other complaints or suits. But the truth that is contained in our site wont be water-washed down by a cult that is known for crying like a baby. Those are signs of a dying horse. Counting down the last days of the ADD cult….
This further confirms the assertion of it Religion dating daan a cult. It is not even a cult of Christianity, but a cult of personality under the guise of being a Christian group.
A man who says he and he alone knows the truth should be wearing a straitjacket. Soriano is the man. Why did Martin Luther leave the Catholic Church? Sometime inone Eliseo Soriano and several other members of respondent corporation disassociated themselves from the latter and succeeded in registering on March 30, a new non-stock religious society or corporation, named Iglesia ng Dios Kay Kristo Hesus, Haligi at Saligan ng Katotohanan.
On May 4,the SEC rendered judgment in favor of respondent, ordering the Iglesia ng Dios Kay Kristo Hesus, Haligi at Saligan Religion dating daan Katotohanan to change its corporate name to another name that is not similar or identical to Religion dating daan name already used by a corporation, partnership or registered with the Commission.
Petitioner filed a motion to dismiss on the ground of lack of cause of action. The motion to dismiss was denied. Thereafter, for Religion dating daan to file an answer, petitioner was declared in default and respondent was allowed to present its evidence ex parte.
On November 20,the SEC rendered a decision ordering petitioner to change its corporate name. The dispositive portion Religion dating daan reads: Petitioner filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals.
Petitioners motion for reconsideration was denied by the Court of Appeals on February 16, Hence, the instant petition for review, raising the following assignment of errors: Invoking the case of Legarda v.
Court of Appeals petitioner insists that the decision of the Court of Appeals and the SEC should be set aside because the negligence of its former counsel of record, Atty. Joaquin Garaygay, in failing to file an answer after its motion "Religion dating daan" dismiss was denied by the SEC, deprived them of their day in court. The contention is without merit. As a general rule, the negligence of counsel binds the client.
This is based on the rule that any act performed by a lawyer within the scope of his general or implied authority is regarded as an act of his client. Court of Appeals, the effort of the counsel in defending his clients consisted in filing a motion for extension of time to file answer before the trial court.
When his client Religion dating daan declared in default, the counsel did nothing and allowed the judgment by default to become final and executory. Upon the insistence of his client, the counsel filed a petition to annul the judgment with the Court of Appeals, which denied the petition, and again the counsel allowed the denial to become final and executory.
This Court found the counsel grossly negligent and consequently declared as null and void the decision adverse to his client. The factual antecedents of the case at bar are different. Garaygay filed before the SEC a motion to dismiss on the of lack of cause of action.
When his client was declared in default for failure to file an answer, Atty. Garaygay moved for reconsideration and lifting of the order of default. Garaygay was only guilty of simple negligence. Although he failed to file an answer that led to the rendition of a judgment by default against petitioner, his efforts were palpably real, albeit bereft of zeal. Likewise, the issue of prescription, which petitioner raised for the first time on appeal to the Court of Appeals, is untenable.
Its failure to raise prescription before the SEC can only be construed as a waiver of that defense. It is the duty of the SEC to prevent confusion in the use of corporate names not only for the Religion dating daan of the corporations involved but more so for the protection of the public.
Section 18 of the Corporation Code provides: When a change in the corporate name is approved, the Commission shall issue an amended certificate of incorporation under the amended name.
Parties organizing a corporation must choose a name at their peril; and the use of a name similar to one adopted by another corporation, whether a business or a nonprofit organization, if misleading or likely to injure in the exercise of its corporate functions, regardless of intent, may be prevented by the corporation having a prior right, by a suit for injunction against the new corporation to prevent the use Religion dating daan the name.
Petitioner claims that it complied with the aforecited SEC guideline by adding not only two but eight words to their registered name, to wit: These words can hardly serve as an effective differentiating medium necessary to avoid confusion or difficulty in distinguishing petitioner from respondent. This is especially so, since both petitioner and respondent corporations are using the same acronym — H. Parenthetically, it is well to mention that the acronym H.
These words are synonymous — both mean ground, foundation or support. Hence, this case is on Religion dating daan fours with Universal Mills Corporation v.
Universal Textile Mills, Inc. We agree with the Court of Appeals conclusion that a contrary ruling would encourage other corporations to adopt verbatim and register an existing and protected corporate name, to the detriment of the public.
The fact that there are other non-stock religious societies or corporations using the names Church of the Living God, Inc. We need not belabor the fourth issue raised by petitioner. Certainly, ordering petitioner to change its corporate name is not a violation of its constitutionally Religion dating daan right to religious freedom.
In so doing, the SEC merely compelled petitioner to abide by one of the SEC guidelines in the approval of partnership and corporate names, namely its undertaking to manifest its willingness to change its corporate name in the event another person, firm, or entity has acquired a prior right to the use of the said firm name or one deceptively or confusingly similar to it. Court of Appeals, et al.
Court of Appeals, supra. I kept hearing about this Ang Dating Daan thing and went to their web page. From what I saw it was some type of protestant denomination in the Philippines. So whats the big deal about them if anything?
Are they making wedding plans yet? Please pray for our brothers and sisters in the Philippines. About us Religion dating daan of Core beliefs??